Red Flag On Hormone Replacement
CBS News -
WASHINGTON, July 9, 2002
Government scientists abruptly ended the nation's biggest
study of a type of hormone replacement therapy, saying long-term use of
estrogen and progestin* significantly increase women's risk of breast cancer,
strokes and heart attacks.
As CBS News Correspondent Maureen Maher reports, the news was startling
enough to warrant press conferences around the country.
Six million American women use this hormone combination, either for short-term
relief of hot flashes and other menopausal symptoms or because of doctors'
long-standing assumptions that long-term use would prevent heart disease and
brittle bones and generally keep women healthier longer.
In fact, there are serious risks to using the hormones for years, risks that
far outweigh the few benefits, the National Institutes of Health announced
Tuesday.
The hormones harm, not protect, the heart — they actually increase previously
healthy women's risk of a heart attack by 29 percent and a stroke by a stunning
41 percent. They also increase women's chances of breast cancer by 26 percent.
On the good side, the hormones cut by a third the risk of colon cancer and hip
fractures — but there are other, safer ways to fend off those illnesses,
doctors noted.
So the NIH stopped the 16,600-woman study three years early, and is advising
other women who use the estrogen-progestin combination to ask their doctors if
they, too, should quit.
Letters have been mailed out to the women in the study telling them to stop
taking the drugs right away.
Barbara Gubelman, who's been in the trial since it started in 1993, accepted
the risks all along.
"We all knew it was an experiment and with experiments sometimes they work,
sometimes they don't," she told CBS.
"We want to get the word out to women and their doctors that long-term use
of this therapy could be harmful," said Dr. Jacques Rossouw, acting
director of the NIH's Women's Health Initiative, which sponsored the study.
The study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, is the
second blow this month to HRT.
Doctors reported last week that the combination of
estrogen and progestin* does not protect women from heart disease after
menopause. "Women with a uterus who are currently taking estrogen plus
progestin should have a serious talk with their doctor to see if they should
continue it," Dr. Jacques Rossouw of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute, who led the study, said in a statement.
"The cardiovascular and cancer risks of estrogen plus progestin outweigh
any benefits and a 26 percent increase in breast cancer risk is too high a
price to pay, even if there were a heart benefit," added the institute's
director, Dr. Claude Lenfant.
Doctors are disappointed by the treatment's resounding failure.
"We thought it would really prevent heart disease, which is in fact the
number one killer even in women," said Dr. Norman Lasser of the New Jersey
Medical School. "Now we know it's not only not going to prevent it, it may
make it worse."
An estimated 38 percent of women past menopause take HRT for a range of
reasons, including immediate relief of symptoms including hot flashes and
sexual problems, as well as to prevent osteoporosis and heart disease.
Women may still want to use the hormones for a short period to treat menopause
symptoms such as hot flashes, he said. But for how long?
"There is no really safe period," he acknowledged, noting that the
heart attack risk hit during women's first year taking the hormones. "As
short a period as you can get away with in order to manage the menopausal
transition."
Other researchers were even more negative.
"We recommend that clinicians stop prescribing this combination for
long-term use," wrote Dr. Suzanne Fletcher of Harvard Medical School in an
editorial accompanying the study results posted on the Web site of the Journal
of the American Medical Association. "Risks from the drug add up over
time."
The study's leaders stressed that women shouldn't panic because personal risk
is pretty small. In one year, for every
10,000 women who take the estrogen-progestin combination there will be eight
more breast cancers, eight more strokes and seven more heart attacks — and six
fewer colon cancers and five fewer hip fractures — compared with 10,000 women
who didn't take the pills.
However, because millions take the
hormones, those numbers can add up to thousands of illnesses, Rossouw
noted
The
estrogen-progestin combination was formulated because taking estrogen
alone was shown to increase the risk of ovarian cancer. For women
who have had hysterectomies and who need HRT, estrogen alone may be
safer, said Fletcher and Dr. Graham Colditz, both of Harvard Medical
School, in a written commentary.
"The (study) provides an important answer for generations of
healthy postmenopausal women to come: do not use estrogen/progestin*
to prevent chronic disease," the two doctors wrote.
To use estrogen or not has long been a vexing question for women entering
menopause. While the study seems definitive, it doesn't settle all
the questions:
What about women who use estrogen alone? The NIH is letting a second,
smaller study of those women continue for now, saying so far the balance
of risks and benefits remains uncertain. Only women who have had hysterectomies
can use estrogen alone, because it causes uterine cancer unless balanced
by progestin.
How do the risks stack up for short-term use? In the latest
study, the cardiovascular risk actually jumped within the first year
of use while the cancer risk didn't appear until around year four.
"The message still goes back to treat your individual needs,"
said study co-author Jennifer Hays of the Baylor College of Medicine.
"If you can't sleep for three weeks (because of night sweats)
and short-term therapy at a low dose helps you with that, quality
of life is an important thing."
This study used Prempro, the most popular estrogen-progestin combination.
But what about lower-dose pills or even skin patches?
Without testing each, "you can get
wrong answers," cautioned study co-author Dr. Norman Lasser of the
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, who wants drug companies to
do such testing. "It's going to be a while 'til we know what's safe."
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, which makes Prempro and other estrogen supplements, said
the main reason women start hormone therapy is to relieve hot flashes, night
sweats or vaginal problems.
"It is important to recognize the critical role" the hormones play
for those women, said Wyeth vice president Dr. Victoria Kusiak.
© MMII, CBS Worldwide Inc. All Rights Reserved. This
material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The
Associated Press and Reuters Limited contributed to this report.
*NOTE:
'Progestin' is NOT the same as 'Progesterone'
There are undisputed differences between bio-identical
natural progesterone and synthetic 'Progestin'
as used in 'The Pill', Prempro and Provera.
Millions
of women have been confused and alarmed -- unaware that pharmaceutically
manufactured synthetic progestin
(Medroxyprogesterone Acetate) is the
culprit - NOT natural progesterone
(obtained from Wild Mexican
Yam and Soya).
The Women’s Health Initiative Study,
referred to in News articles,
failed to
clearly state that the HRT given
contained
synthetic, NOT natural hormones.
Although the proper word "Progestin"
was used, explanation as to how very
different these two hormones are, was omitted.
Synthetic progesterone i.e.‘Progestin’ is the chemical HRT drug
responsible for increased breast cancer, heart disease, strokes, blood
clots and coronary embolisms.
Natural Progesterone is
the beneficial, safe, effective menopausal alternative. Knowing the difference can help you make an
informed intelligent choice . . .
Safe,
natural, bio-identical progesterone
cream.
ProgestaPlus
All Natural Progesterone body cream.
Hygienically sealed 3 oz measured pump dispenser. (20 ml with each press of the pump,
60 doses total)
FDA certified laboratory
Aarisse Health Care Products
POB 210, Oakland, NJ 07436
Toll-Free 800 675-9329
It’s Bio-Identical !
www.HealthyHormones.com
En Espańol : www.HormonasNaturales.com
Women taking Prempro had a higher
risk of some diseases and a lower risk of others, than those taking a placebo.
The study followed 16,608 women for 5.2 years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heart Attack & Cardiac Death
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Women's Health Initiative, JAMA
|